Difference between revisions of "Talk:SoC/Ideas"

 
(Comments about smbclient / ejs)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
What extensions would exactly be needed that are not covered by the wireshark conformance files at the moment? From what I've understood from Ronnie Sahlberg, the current extensions are sufficient --[[User:JelmerVernooij|ctrlsoft]] 11:34, 1 March 2007 (CST)
 
What extensions would exactly be needed that are not covered by the wireshark conformance files at the moment? From what I've understood from Ronnie Sahlberg, the current extensions are sufficient --[[User:JelmerVernooij|ctrlsoft]] 11:34, 1 March 2007 (CST)
 +
 +
==smbclient in ejs==
 +
 +
I wouldn't be too much of a fan of this, given my reservations about EJS in non-web applications. Not sure if this is the right moment to voice them though, or rather when the proposals come in? --[[User:JelmerVernooij|ctrlsoft]] 11:39, 1 March 2007 (CST)

Latest revision as of 17:39, 1 March 2007

About Wireshark pidl extension)

What extensions would exactly be needed that are not covered by the wireshark conformance files at the moment? From what I've understood from Ronnie Sahlberg, the current extensions are sufficient --ctrlsoft 11:34, 1 March 2007 (CST)

smbclient in ejs

I wouldn't be too much of a fan of this, given my reservations about EJS in non-web applications. Not sure if this is the right moment to voice them though, or rather when the proposals come in? --ctrlsoft 11:39, 1 March 2007 (CST)