Difference between revisions of "SysVol replication (DFS-R)"

m (/* grammar)
m (Added categoy.)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
* [[Bidirectional Rsync/osync based SysVol replication workaround|Bidirectional Rsync/osync based SysVol replication workaround]] (Samba DCs only): More complex, requires third party script, each DC requires a cron job against each other DC
 
* [[Bidirectional Rsync/osync based SysVol replication workaround|Bidirectional Rsync/osync based SysVol replication workaround]] (Samba DCs only): More complex, requires third party script, each DC requires a cron job against each other DC
 
* [[Robocopy_based_SysVol_replication_workaround|Robocopy based SysVol replication workaround]] (Samba DCs -> Windows DCs): Quick set, easy to configure, uses MS robocopy
 
* [[Robocopy_based_SysVol_replication_workaround|Robocopy based SysVol replication workaround]] (Samba DCs -> Windows DCs): Quick set, easy to configure, uses MS robocopy
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
----
 +
[[Category:Active Directory]]

Revision as of 21:24, 26 February 2017

Samba in its current state doesn't support SysVol replication via DFS-R (Distributed File System Replication) or the older FRS (File Replication Service) used in Windows Server 2000/2003 for Sysvol replication.

We Currently advise administrators to use one of the following workarounds: