Samba on Scale: Difference between revisions
From SambaWiki
Slowfranklin (talk | contribs) (→Links) |
Slowfranklin (talk | contribs) (→Links) |
||
| Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
* [https://li-boxuan.medium.com/distributed-transaction-in-database-from-epaxos-to-accord-6de7999ad08e Summary of Paxos, Multipaxos, Raft, Epaxos and ACCORD] |
* [https://li-boxuan.medium.com/distributed-transaction-in-database-from-epaxos-to-accord-6de7999ad08e Summary of Paxos, Multipaxos, Raft, Epaxos and ACCORD] |
||
* [https://www.cockroachlabs.com/blog/consistency-model/ Nice Summary of Consistency Models and Issues in CockroachDB] |
* [https://www.cockroachlabs.com/blog/consistency-model/ Nice Summary of Consistency Models and Issues in CockroachDB] |
||
* [https://forums.foundationdb.org/t/proof-of-concept-filesystem-layer/1605 FUSE Filesystem on-top of FoundationDB] |
|||
Revision as of 10:38, 28 January 2023
List of scalable Key/Value Stores
For an overview of Consistency Models see Jepsen or Wikipedia.
| Name | Consistency Model | Transactions | C Client | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ctdb | Volatile DBs: Sequential Consistency Persistent DBs: Linearizability |
No Yes |
yes | |
| etcd | Linearizability | Yes ("mini") | yes | Performance? |
| Ceph Rados | Linearizability | ? | yes | |
| Apache Cassandra | Configurable: Linearizability with LWT New: Strict Serializability [1] |
yes | yes | |
| Apache HBase | ? | ? | ? | |
| Apache Ignite | ? | ? | ? | |
| FoundationDB | Strict Serializability | yes | yes | |
| CockroachDB | Serializable+, Strong Partition Serializability | ? | yes | |
| ScyllaDB | Single-key Linearizability with LWT | ? | yes | |
| YugabyteDB | Linearizability with LWT | ? | yes | |
| tikv | Strong Consistency[2] | yes | no (C++) | |
| Apache Pegasus | ? | ? | no (C++) |
List of Opensource Clustered Filesystems
| Name | Built on-top of Object Storage | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Ceph | yes | |
| GlusterFS | no | |
| JuiceFS | yes | |
| MooseFS | no | |
| ObjectiveFS | yes | |
| Lustre | no |