Samba Security Process: Difference between revisions

From SambaWiki
(link to CVE-marked bugs in bugzilla.)
(we ask for a CVE for crashes in auto-restart services)
Line 19: Line 19:


Security issues are usually reported via
Security issues are usually reported via

Line 74: Line 73:
This is similar to, but an extension of, our existing rule that
This is similar to, but an extension of, our existing rule that
crashing the smbd belonging to the connecting user is not a DoS.
crashing the smbd belonging to the connecting user is not a DoS.

However, we do:
- ask for a CVE (step 5.)
- place the CVE on the bug (step 5b.)
- leave or make the bug public (step 14. and 14a.)
- mark the commits with the CVE (step 6a.)

5.) Ask for a CVE (usually Red Hat Product Security
5.) Ask for a CVE (usually Red Hat Product Security
Line 260: Line 265:


Revision as of 22:15, 5 September 2021

Below is the process the Samba Team follows to prepare a security release and co-ordinate the disclosure of a security vulnerability.

Reporting Security Defects in Samba

Please report all security issues or defects in Samba or concerning our infrustructure to and never on IRC, public mailing lists or in Bugzilla!

For clarity, a Samba Team member will create the private Bugzilla issue mentioned below.

A public security process for Samba

The following process is followed by the Samba Team Member working on the security issue.

We publish it as a service to the Free Software and broader software development community as a well-worked, practical process for responsible disclosure and to our aid our Samba community in knowing how we handle serious security issues in our code.

Security issues are usually reported via

1.) Someone should feel responsible and make sure that it's really a
    security defect. If yes, we need one person who is responsible for
    this specific issue beyond this point. This person coordinates the
    further actions and might delegate tasks, of course.

2.) Create a bug report with limited access to "Samba core developers"
    only!  This is done by selecting 'Show advanced fields' and at the
    very bottom:

   'Only users in all of the selected groups can view this bug:

    [x] Samba Core Developers

2a.) Change the summary so that it starts with "[EMBARGOED][SECURITY]"

    For example:

    "[EMBARGOED][SECURITY] dsdb: time wrap at end of unix time

2b.) Add all information including reproducer etc. to the bug report.

3.) Write an initial advisory and attach it to the bug report. A
    template is available here:

3a.) Confirm with the initial reporter that they are willing to be
     publicly thanked and any affiliation they wish to have noted.

4.) Do a CVSSv3.1 calculation ([2]) and add it to the bug report and the

4a.) Stop and ask for advise on if the CVSSv3.1
     score is less than 5.0.  This is a heavy-weight process with
     costs to many parties.

4b.) Even for a CVSSv3.1 of more than 5.0 we do not do a security
     release where the impact is only a Denial of Service (not a use
     after free) and the automated internal process restart will allow
     other clients to reconnect eventually.

     For clarity, the shared LDAP or KDC process in the AD DC will
     restart, so a simple NULL de-reference crash there would not
     trigger a release.  However a similar issue in the main smbd
     listener preventing new connections being established may require
     a release.

     These issues are real, important and should be backported to
     maintained releases, but do not justify the costs of coordinated
     disclosure or a seperate security release.

     This is similar to, but an extension of, our existing rule that
     crashing the smbd belonging to the connecting user is not a DoS.

     However, we do:
      - ask for a CVE (step 5.)
      - place the CVE on the bug (step 5b.)
      - leave or make the bug public (step 14. and 14a.)
      - mark the commits with the CVE (step 6a.)

5.) Ask for a CVE (usually Red Hat Product Security
    <> does help out on this one).

To:      Red Hat Product Security <>
Subject: Another Samba CVE (bug XXXX)

Red Hat Product Security,

Can I please get a CVE for what will be Samba Bug XXXX?

The Samba team has evaluated this issue and determined that it will
require a security release.  Details are confidential for now, but will
be clearly marked as bug XXXX (so you can connect the threads once
vendors are notified).


    DO NOT attach the advisory from step 3.  This avoids two issues:
     - If Red Hat gets the advisory, they need to get GDPR permission for
       the reporter name and we don't want to block on the back and forth
       for that (see 3a).
     - It keeps all vendors on the same basis.

     See [1] for GPG key etc if the circumstances require it.

5b.) If for any reason Red Hat is unable to assist with obtaining a
     CVE number in time, the backup process is to fill in this form (explain the situation in the

5c.) After receiving the CVE number, please add it as an
     alias (this is a seperate bugzilla field) on the bug report
     and to the summary (title), eg:
     CVE-2038-12345 [EMBARGOED][SECURITY]...

6.) Write patches and tests and add them to the bug report.  Mark them
    WIP in the description until they are 'final'.
    (Even 'final' patches may change after being subject to review of

6a.) ALL commits in the patch should have a CVE prefix and a BUG tag eg:

  CVE-2038-12345 dsdb: time wrap at end of unix time

  At time_t rollover all AD security is lost due to integer wrap on
  32-bit systems


  Signed-off-by: Time Lord <>

6b.) Ask for early review of your WIP and final master patches ASAP

6c.) Prepare backports for all affected and supported versions

     (1 file per version, even if identical).

     Files should be named $CVE-$DESCRIPTION-$MAJOR-$VERSION.patch


6d.) Run *private* autobuild (see doc/autobuild.txt) or *private*
     Gitlab CI for each CVE and each maintained branch.  (This allows
     the release manager to defer some patches if problems appear
     later in the process).

6e.) Mark the patch that has passed with the ci-passed flag in the
     bugzilla attachment details.

6f.) Once each CVE patch and branch has passed, ask for review ASAP.

6g.) Get one explicit review flag in Bugzilla (yours, as a team member,
     is implicit and CI passed is now a distinct flag).

7.) Once all patches and the advisory are available and reviewed, ask
    the release manager for a release date.

7a.) Between now and the release, the release manager or their
     delegate will run a *private* autobuild of the exact combination
     of patches the be released.

7b.) If multiple issues are being released in a batch, create a
     tracking bug that is blocked by the CVEs to be addressed in this

8.) Finish the advisory and attach it to the bug report as
    advisory-$CVE.txt.  Ask for review.  (This must be after getting
    the release date so the correct version numbers can be included).

9.) ~10 days before the release date, confirm every patch and the CVE
    text still has the correct reviews (due to additional feedback for

9a.) add samba-vendor to the CC list in the bug report,

9b.) open the bug report by checking "Core developers, and Vendors
     shipping Samba as part of their products" and removing "Samba
     Core Developers".

9c.) Add the planned release date to the bug or the tracking bug if
     that has been created.  This will be the first useful e-mail seen
     by our vendors.

10.) 7 days before the release date, send an e-mail to, and indicating there will be a security
     release and the broad component it impacts.  This is to allow
     large installations time to prepare for security patching.

     For example:

Cc:	 Upstream Samba Technical Mailing list <>,
Subject: Heads-up: Security Releases ahead!

this is a heads-up that there will be Samba security updates on
Tuesday, XXXXX YYth. Please make sure that your Samba
servers will be updated soon after the release!

Impacted components:
 - AD DC (CVSS 7.5, High)
 - client (CVSS 5.9, Medium)
 - file server / classic DC (CVSS 6.8 Medium)

10a.) Note that this represents the final GO/NO-GO point.  In order to
      facilitate creation of tarballs etc, after this date the patches
      and CVE text *must not change* or else the release will need to
      be publicly rescheduled, patches dropped or other appropriate
      action taken at the absolute discretion of the release manager.

11.) The release manager or their delegate will prepare the tarballs
     in the *stable* branches:
    - git fetch
    - git rebase
    - git merge -ff-only the VERSION bump commit from the corresponding test
    - apply the security patchset
    - WHATSNEW.txt: add the release notes
    - add an empty announce.samba-$VERSION.quotation.txt file
    - GNUPGHOME=$PATH_TO_THE_RELEASE_KEY script/ samba-stable create

    On the release day:
    Upload the files and publish the announcements as described in steps
    3.) and 4.) in team-info/doc/releases/howto_releases.txt 

12.) Additional steps for the release manager:
     - upload the signed security patch(es) to the ftp server:
     - push the advisory to the samba-web git repository:
     - update samba-web/history/security.html

     Merge the tags to the test branches:
     - git fetch
     - git rebase
     - git merge $TAG
     - VERSION: bump version
     - push without autobuild:
       LC_SAMBA_AUTOBUILD_PUSH=1 git push-v4-X-test-skip-autobuild

13.) After shipping the releases, the responsible person must make
     sure that the patches find their way into the master branch and
     remove the [EMBARGOED] tag from the bug report.

14.) Mark as 'private' any sensitive comments or attachments

14a.) Then un-select the "Core developers, and Vendors shipping Samba
      as part of their products" restriction.

15.) Address any minor improvements that were suggested after the
     patches were frozen and incorporate those into commits in master.

16.) Close out bug report when patches have been pushed to *all* relevant

17.) Now that any regressions etc will have been broadly noticed,
     remove samba-vendor from the CC list of the now public bug, ask
     that they subscribe individually if still interested.


Template security advisory

The template security advisory is here: File:Template security advisory.txt

In Video

There is a Video of a presentation by Jeremy Allison about this security process in practice.